Peter Verdée: Constitutional logic

Seminars of the Department of Logic

Further information

Invitation pdf

Peter Verdée (Université catholique de Louvain)

Constitutional logic
A non-revisionary approach to hyperintensionality and relevance

In this talk I present a novel framework to define hyperintensional notions, relativized to any existing truth-functional logics. We formalize the meaning of connectives and formulas of a given language by means of a set of bilateral grounding statements, the constitution of the (deterministic or non-deterministic) truth-functional logic. The members of a constitution, constitutive sequents, are a special kind of sequents that express how the meaning of semantically complex sentences is based on the meaning of less complex formulas. We define a set of basic, structural rules: Identity, Mixed Cut and Weakening. If constitutions are closed under all three of them, one obtains the existing Tarski logic. However, when the Weakening rule is dropped, one naturally obtains a consequence relation that is relevant, in the sense that only those sequents are deducible that do not contain premises or conclusions that have no impact on the validity of the sequent. All the other sequents are deducible. When also Identity is dropped, one obtains a theory of bilateral logical grounding. I will also present a simple generic Truthmaker Semantics for constitutional logics. This way one obtains an exact semantics (in Kit Fine’s sense of the word) for every logic that can be characterized as a constitutional logic. This can then be used to define well-known hyperintensional notions such as exact consequence, analytic implication, hyperintensional propositions, and partial truth, relativized to a logic. 

Join us on Zoom 
cesnet.zoom.us/j/96869302116?pwd=bHlFektFMi9lZXBUeDd5WHM0RmE3QT09
Meeting ID: 968 6930 2116
Passcode: 082189