News and Articles

Social media and generative artificial intelligence (genAI) are driving a structural transformation of online information environments, making it increasingly difficult for citizens to determine which sources are credible, which claims are trustworthy, and whether content is human-generated or synthetic. This transformation is undermining cognitive agency: namely, citizens’ ability to assess and revise beliefs independently. Without it, democratic deliberation and self-determination falter.

As current EU regulation does not sufficiently address these changes, a group of experts affiliated with the Centre for Environmental and Technology Ethics – Prague (CETE-P) at the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences presents three key recommendations in a new Policy Paper:

• Expand the definitions of systemic risk and manipulation in the AI Act and the DSA to capture harms from synthetic content to information environments.
• Strengthen cognitive agency by expanding digital literacy programs in the Democracy Shield Initiative.
• Improve DSA enforcement to protect information environments through better research access and resources.

It was a joint project of CETE-P's Tuğba Yoldaş, John Dorsch and Paula Gürtler in cooperation with Jacqueline Bellon, Jakub Šimko, Matúš Mesarčík, Sara Solarova and Andrew McIntyre.

Czech version of the Policy Paper will follow. There will be a Policy Paper Nr. 2 in this series to follow.

Download Policy Brief 

The latest Annual Report of the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences goes beyond the legally required information, offering a vivid overview of the Institute’s research activities and its role in public debate.

Browse online / Download

The Scottish philosopher David Hume has fascinated scholars and the wider public for three centuries. He continues to attract attention not only because of his views, some of which are controversial today, but also because, in the 18th century, he introduced a new and more radical conception of philosophy that profoundly shaped the development of European thought.

“He stands at the threshold between older modes of thinking and something we call European modernity,” says Hynek Janoušek of the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences, who is also one of the main organizers of an international conference dedicated to David Hume. This year’s conference, subtitled The New Life of David Hume, will take place in Prague from 29 June to 3 July and will cover topics ranging from history and the history of ideas to the reconstruction of Hume’s biographies.

One of the conference’s main aims is to present Hume’s thought in its full complexity and subject it to critical reflection. “Hume made a fundamental contribution to theories of the soul and consciousness, moral and political philosophy, legal theory, and aesthetics,” Janoušek adds. In his own time, however, Hume was best known as a founder of modern historiography, having written the first multi-volume history of England, which was quickly translated into several foreign languages.

On Human Nature

According to Janoušek, what draws scholars to Hume today is his radical understanding of human nature. In exploring it, Hume returned to fundamental questions and approached them in a new way, while drawing inspiration from classical philosophy written in Latin. These included questions such as suicide and the immortality of the soul, on which he took positions opposed to Christian doctrine. He did so using concepts and methods that may seem almost self-evident today, yet in ways that remain striking. On the one hand, he shared the optimism of emerging modernity and the belief that both nature and culture could be studied experimentally and that their empirical regularities could be described. On the other hand, he argued that, in the process of cognition, the human mind itself helps shape the world of experience and the regularities it perceives within it. It does so on the basis of principles that cannot themselves be rationally justified. For Hume, the basic categories through which we understand reality therefore have the character of necessary fictions.

Although Hume is one of the great figures of the Enlightenment, some of his views are deeply troubling from today’s perspective. While he was relatively progressive in his views on women and condemned the slave system of ancient Rome, he also accepted the slave trade of his own time, regarded Black Africans as inferior, and invested in sugarcane plantations. Janoušek points out, however, that Hume’s positions need to be understood in the context of his era. “You can condemn him as a historical figure, but you do so using the very tools he himself helped to provide,” he adds.

This year’s 52nd Annual Hume Society Conference, titled The New Life of David Hume, will bring together eighty participants from eighteen countries, including Canada, Ireland, and Brazil. The conference is organized by the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences and the Faculty of Humanities at Charles University. The event is supported by Strategy AV21, the Hume Society, and the Faculty of Arts at Charles University.

About the Hume Society

Founded in 1974, the Hume Society is an international organization of scholars from dozens of countries. Its mission is to support research on all aspects of the thought and work of David Hume, the 18th-century Scottish philosopher, historian, and essayist. Membership is open to anyone interested in Hume and his philosophical and literary contemporaries.

Conference Programme

Conference Website

The Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences, together with other academic institutions in the Czech Republic, has issued a statement in support of the Russian scholar of ancient philosophy Svetlana Mesyats, who works at the Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Her case raises serious concerns about academic freedom and the personal safety of scholars in Russia.

Dr Mesyats was arrested in May 2026 and placed under house arrest over alleged irregularities in the reporting of results from a research and translation project, and now faces a prison sentence of up to ten years. Given her international scholarly reputation, the nature of the low-cost humanities project, and the broader context of long-standing pressure on the Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, there is concern that the property-related charges may be serving as a pretext for political and ideological control over the academic institution and its direction. The Czech historical experience of the persecution of academics between 1948 and 1989 reinforces the fear that this case may likewise be an instance of suppressing free scholarship under an ostensibly legal pretext.

JOINT STATEMENT BY CZECH ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS IN SUPPORT OF THE RUSSIAN PHILOSOPHER SVETLANA MESYATS

We are following the events at the Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow with great concern. Our colleague Svetlana Mesyats, Ph.D., was arrested on May 19, 2026, and subsequently placed under house arrest. This occurred in connection with alleged irregularities in the reporting of results from a seven-year research and translation project in the field of ancient philosophy. Several of her colleagues were also detained and interrogated. Dr. Mesyats has been charged with a property-related offense, for which she faces up to ten years in prison.

Dr. Mesyats is an internationally renowned and respected expert in her field. She has published studies on ancient Neoplatonism and the Aristotelian tradition, as well as a monograph on Goethe. She has served as a visiting scholar at several German universities and is a member of the International Society for Neoplatonic Studies. Czech and foreign colleagues who know Dr. Mesyats as a conscientious, modest, and honest person consider the charges brought against her to be highly improbable. Moreover, property-related charges of this severity in connection with low-cost projects such as the translation of philosophical texts from Classical Greek are extremely unusual.

In our view, Dr. Mesyats’s case must be viewed in the context of long-standing and well-documented efforts to subject the Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences to stricter ideological and state control. The Institute has repeatedly been accused of being “pro-Western” and “liberal.” There have also been public calls for its employees to undergo ideological vetting. The study of Aristotle’s writings, to which Dr. Mesyats’s project was dedicated, was labeled in some of these attacks as “pro-Western,” “pro-democratic,” and therefore “unpatriotic” or hostile to Russian culture. In this context, the question arises as to whether the alleged doubts about the proper reporting of the project’s results do not in fact conceal an effort to exert political and ideological control over the Institute of Philosophy and over the type of scientific activity conducted there.

The experience of our country from 1948 to 1989 reminds us that in a totalitarian state that systematically violates human rights, academic freedom is often restricted as well. We know that many academics, particularly in the humanities, were persecuted for their political views or simply for refusing to conform to the party line in their work. This injustice was often given the appearance of legitimacy through spurious charges. Against the backdrop of this experience, we consider it our duty to express serious concerns not only about academic freedom in the Russian Federation, but also about the personal safety of Dr. Mesyats and her colleagues.

ENDORSED BY:
Institute of Philosophy, Czech Academy of Sciences
Faculty of Arts, Charles University
Faculty of Arts, Palacký University Olomouc
Faculty of Arts, University of Ostrava
Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, University of Pardubice
Faculty of Arts, University of West Bohemia in Pilsen
Sts Cyril and Methodius Faculty of Theology, Palacký University Olomouc
Council of the Learned Society of the Czech Republic
Department of Philosophy and History of Science, Faculty of Science Charles University
Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Faculty of Theology, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice

Joint Statement to download

Contacts:
Mgr. Matyáš Havrda, Ph.D., DSc., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Doc. Robert Roreitner, Dr. Phil., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

FURTHER INFORMATION AND SOURCES

1. Svetlana Mesyats: scholarly profile and publications

• Institute of Philosophy profile:
  https://iphras.ru/mesyats.htm
• Academia.edu profile:
  https://svetla.academia.edu/SvetlanaMesyats

2. Raid on the Institute, detention, house arrest, and criminal charges

• https://meduza.io/en/feature/2026/05/22/russia-s-institute-of-philosophy-raided-over-fraud-case-tied-to-aristotle-translation-project-the-institute-had-previously-been-accused-of-disloyalty-to-the-kremlin
• https://theins.press/en/news/292891

3. Earlier attacks on the Institute of Philosophy and the Aristotle translation project

• https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2026/05/25/antisovetskie-filosofskie-kontratseptsii
• https://t-invariant.org/2026/05/targeting-aristotle-the-philosophers-case-started-over-economics-but-will-end-in-politics/
•  https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2026/05/28/russian-philosopher-reportedly-charged-with-embezzling-public-funds-intended-for-aristotle-translations-a92873

4. Broader context: pressure on academics and the use of administrative or financial charges

• https://t-invariant.org/2026/06/molchanie-ne-spasaet-filosofy-zapustili-otkrytoe-pismo-v-zashhitu-svetlany-mesyats/

Although novelty is implicitly ubiquitous in science, it has recently itself become a new object of research within the science of science. What lies behind the current emphasis on novelty in science? What counts as new, and who gets to decide? The Centre for Science, Technology, and Society Studies at the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences invites prospective participants to submit abstracts for the international research symposium Novelty and Inequalities in Science, which will take place in Prague on 8–9 October 2026. Contributions may be submitted until 30 June 2026.

The symposium aims to provide a shared platform for reflecting on the recent attention devoted to novelty research and for discussing the relationship between novelty and inequalities in science. We welcome empirically grounded contributions using computational, network, quantitative, or qualitative methods in fields such as the science of science, research on research, scientometrics, and sociology of science.

Participants are invited to share both completed and work-in-progress research in the form of non-archival presentations and discussion.

Abstracts of 150–300 words may be submitted by 30 June 2026.

More information, the latest updates, and submission guidelines

Contact: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

How is the climate crisis linked to gender and politics? What does “more-than-human world” mean? Why isn’t technology alone enough to solve the problem? Why are care, responsibility, and solidarity important? These are the key questions of episode Nr. 10 of our video-podcast Zelený drát with CETE-P's Iwona Janicka on ecofeminism and new narratives that might change our society. You can find your listening for the weekend on YouTube or Spotify.

With leading researchers from CETE-P and beyond, Zelený drát explores the ethical implications of modern technology and the ethics of our relationship with the environment. Use of robots in social services or military, artificial intelligence and its social implications or the limits of biotechnology - these are a.o. the topics we bring. In the field of the environment, we discuss questions such as how to involve animals in decision-making processes, what exactly it means to coexist with other species on one planet, and how technology can help nature. Moderated by Martina Spěváčková.

The third edition of the international interdisciplinary conference Climate Crisis and the Question of Justice will welcome experts whose work focuses on the issues of climate crisis and just transition, adaptation measures and policies, the status and conditions of climate activists, the impacts of climate change on society, and theoretical reflections on these topics in the social sciences and humanities. Deadline for applications is 31 July 2026.

The international conference provides a forum for interdisciplinary dialogue on one of the most pressing challenges of our time: the multifaceted impacts of the climate crisis amid the current polycrisis. This includes, among other things, ongoing geopolitical conflicts, energy transition, shifting global inequalities, and the growing environmental burden. The overarching goal of the conference is to promote critical reflection on the climate crisis as a complex phenomenon that is fundamentally transforming the relationships between society, economy, politics, and the environment. Special attention will be given to issues of climate justice in the context of current crises, including the tension between climate policy and the social impacts of the transition, conflicts surrounding its distribution, and the rise of political backlashes such as populism or resistance to environmental measures.

We welcome contributions particularly in the following thematic areas:

• Climate justice in the context of a polycrisis: the interconnection of the climate crisis with war, the energy transition, migration, security, and changes in asylum regimes;
• Conflicts and political dynamics of transformation: social and regional impacts of transformation, tensions between climate and social policy, backlash, populism, and politicization of climate measures;
• Political economy and global inequalities: financing the transition (debt, reparations, destruction), global asymmetries, changes in supply chains, issues of self-sufficiency, resilience, and security;
• Power, governance, and space: the climate crisis in undemocratic regimes, participation and its limits, land ownership, land-use planning;
• Affective, cultural, and imaginative dimensions of the climate crisis: climate anxiety, grief, and fatigue; pollution and toxicity; as well as imagined futures in the context of the climate crisis.

The form to submit a paper can be found under this link 

Submissions and further information

The Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences has long supported the internationalisation of its working environment and the development of international cooperation. To further these efforts, it is now establishing a Welcome Office, which also includes individual buddy support. The aim of this initiative is to help international employees and guests arrive in the Czech Republic, find their bearings in a new environment, and integrate into the working life of the Institute.

The Welcome Office provides practical, organisational and informational support to international staff during the onboarding process and throughout their time at the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences. This initiative forms part of the Institute’s human resources and recruitment support.

Main Areas of Support

• The Welcome Office assists international colleagues primarily with:
• navigating the internal processes of the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences;
• administrative and practical matters related to their arrival and stay;
• navigating everyday life in Prague and the Czech Republic;
• finding accommodation and communicating with real estate agencies;
• opening a bank account;
• communicating with public authorities and other institutions;
• obtaining basic information about health insurance, transport and everyday life in the Czech Republic;
• integrating into the workplace community and academic environment.

Information Support for International Staff and Guests

As part of the Welcome Office activities, information and orientation materials for international employees and guests are being developed and continuously updated. They contain practical information on employment, residence in the Czech Republic, the internal processes of the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences, and everyday life in Prague.

Support is provided in both Czech and English. In delivering this support, the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences also cooperates with relevant external institutions, such as the EURAXESS network and the Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic.

Contact

Mgr. Hana Bulejová
Buddy
Office 115/a
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Tel.: +420 221 183 213

Project Funding

The establishment and operation of the Welcome Office are supported by a grant from the Jan Amos Komenský Operational Programme of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, registration no. CZ.02.01.01/00/23_026/0011441.

How do cities and regions change after industry has retreated or undergone fundamental transformation? What consequences do deindustrialization and post-socialist transformation bring for the economy, society, and everyday life? And how have these processes shaped Europe in the past and today? These questions will be addressed by the international conference After Industry: Cities and Regions in Transformation, which will take place on 14–15 May 2026 in Prague.

The conference opens up one of the key issues of our time: how cities and regions are changing at a moment when industry is retreating, transforming, or taking on new forms — and how these processes have shaped European societies in the past and continue to shape them today. The meeting will offer an interdisciplinary perspective on the transformation of cities and regions in Central and Eastern Europe as well as in a broader global context — from historical connections and social impacts to current strategies of adaptation and development. It will show how the loss of industry affects everyday life, community identity, people’s relationship to place, and political attitudes. Above all, it will emphasize the long-term perspectives of these processes and their changing forms over time.

“Experts from across Central and Eastern Europe will gather in Prague, and we have also succeeded in bringing major international figures in this field of research into the programme,” says Ondřej Ševeček from the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences, one of the conference organizers.

The keynote speakers include Steven High of Concordia University, Montréal, a leading global expert on deindustrialization research, as well as Kerstin Brückweh of the Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS) and Rebecca Madgin of the University of Glasgow. In their lectures, they will offer perspectives on the transformation of industrial and post-industrial societies in different contexts, grounded in long-term research.

Public Debate on the Search for New Paths
The programme will also include a public panel debate, After Industry: Rethinking Local Economies, Memory, and Industrial Identity, which will take place on 14 May 2026 at 7:00 p.m. at Kampus Hybernská in Prague 1, in the Circular Hub. It will address questions of decline and renewal in industrial cities, transformations of local economies, identity, social inequalities, and the search for new paths of development in different parts of the world. It will connect an international perspective with deeper knowledge of the Central and Eastern European context. The debate will be chaired by Adéla Gjuričová, Director of the Institute of Contemporary History of the Czech Academy of Sciences.

Selected contributions will form the basis of a collective scholarly publication in English for an international audience, offering a deeper understanding of the dynamics of deindustrialization from both historical and contemporary perspectives.

The conference is made possible thanks to the support of the Jan Amos Komenský Operational Programme within the research project Urbanity: Inequality, Adaptation and Urban Public Space in Historical Perspective (CZ.02.01.01/00/23_025/0008735) and is organized in cooperation between the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences, the Institute of Contemporary History of the Czech Academy of Sciences, and Palacký University Olomouc. Among the international partners, the Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS) is also involved in the organization. The accompanying programme will take place with the support of the Czech Academy of Sciences’ Strategy AV21 programme, “The Power of Objects: Materiality between Past and Future.”